Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add workflow ids in download-artifact actions #250

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jackkleeman
Copy link
Contributor

These can be seen with gh workflow list on the appropriate repo

Fixes #248

These can be seen with `gh workflow list` on the appropriate repo
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Test Results

102 files  ±0  102 suites  ±0   10m 34s ⏱️ +21s
 93 tests ±0   93 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
232 runs  ±0  232 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 9637ff9. ± Comparison against base commit 7258894.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Contributor

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for fixing this problem so quickly @jackkleeman. The changes look good to me. I had a few minor comments. +1 for merging after resolving them.

@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ jobs:
uses: dawidd6/action-download-artifact@v2
with:
github_token: ${{ secrets.SDK_TYPESCRIPT_ACTION_READ_TOKEN || secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unrelated: Do we still need the github_token since the sdk-typescript repo is now public?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

probably not!

Copy link
Contributor

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. +1 for merging.

@jackkleeman jackkleeman merged commit 2d7efa1 into main Jan 17, 2024
2 checks passed
@slinkydeveloper slinkydeveloper deleted the workflow-ids branch January 17, 2024 12:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cannot run e2e workflow with specified sdk-typescript commit
2 participants